Toward a Global Accord: Laying the Foundations for an International Treaty on Nonhuman Technology

The history of our planet is replete with instances where unknown technologies have graced our skies, sparking curiosity and wonder. These occurrences, often beyond the scope of our contemporary understanding, suggest the presence of nonhuman technology – a concept that encompasses technologies not originating from the known trajectory of human civilization.

This policy paper seeks to explore this realm, where the lines between the known and the unknown, the present and the extraordinary, blur in the face of such phenomena.

As we delve into the annals of history, we find numerous accounts of aerial phenomena and technological marvels that defy conventional explanation. These historical instances are not mere artifacts of folklore but potential indicators of technological advancements that transcend our current understanding. This perspective urges us to broaden our view and consider the possibility of technologies emerging from sources beyond our conventional civilization – whether from different eras, distant societies, or even other dimensions of existence.

Addressing the implications of nonhuman technology is not only a matter of scientific and technological interest but also of global policy and governance. As these technologies potentially represent a paradigm shift in our understanding of science and technology, they necessitate a comprehensive approach in policy-making, regulation, and international cooperation. This paper aims to provide a foundational discourse on how we can navigate this unexplored territory with responsibility and foresight.

Echoing the words of Arthur C. Clarke, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic,” we find ourselves at a juncture where the distinction between the possible and the fantastical becomes increasingly blurred. This paper endeavors to demystify the realm of nonhuman technology, proposing a framework for its ethical use, regulation, and integration into our global society. Our journey through this paper is one of discovery, caution, and anticipation, as we seek to understand and prepare for a future intertwined with these extraordinary technological phenomena.

II. Definition of Nonhuman Technology

A. Conceptualizing Nonhuman Technology

Nonhuman Technology encompasses technologies emerging from sources beyond the scope of current mainstream human civilization. This broad definition includes advancements that may not align with our conventional understanding of technology, as they might originate from various non-traditional sources such as extratemporal civilizations, breakaway societies, or even extraterrestrial intelligences.

The work of the Hipster Energy Team, particularly in “Beyond Boundaries: Rethinking the Definition of Life” and “Beyond the Observable: Reimagining the Cosmos with Non-Materialist Cosmological Tools,” underscores the need to reconsider our understanding of what constitutes technology. These papers propose that our perception of technology is limited by our current understanding of physics and material science.

Thanks for reading Elevated Solidarity! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

B. The Uncommon Nature of Nonhuman Technology

Nonhuman Technology may not always be recognizable to us as technology, especially if our understanding of physics is incomplete or if these technologies operate on principles beyond our current scientific paradigms. In “Overcoming Materialist Reductionism: A New Paradigm in Scientific Inquiry,” the Hipster Energy Team argues for the expansion of our scientific frameworks to include non-materialist perspectives. This approach is crucial in recognizing and understanding technologies that may operate on principles of reality that are not yet known or widely accepted in mainstream science.

Similarly, “Exploring the Parapsychological Ecosystem: Unraveling Consciousness and Non-Materialist Communication Pathways” delves into the potential of non-material forms of communication, suggesting that what we perceive as ‘unexplained phenomena’ might be manifestations of advanced technology based on non-materialist principles.

In summary, the definition and understanding of Nonhuman Technology require us to look beyond our current scientific constraints and to be open to the possibilities of technologies that may operate under a different set of rules or principles. This openness is essential for the responsible governance and ethical use of such technologies.

III. Current Landscape and Challenges of Nonhuman Technology

The narrative surrounding nonhuman technology intersects with a myriad of global institutions, encompassing a diverse range of sectors and interests. This includes prominent aerospace and defense companies, both national and international, which are integral to the development and exploration of advanced technologies. Entities like Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Airbus, and Roscosmos have long been at the forefront of aerospace innovation and could be key in understanding the evolution and presence of nonhuman technology.

Historical and cultural institutions, such as the Vatican and the Smithsonian, with their extensive archives and influence, also play a significant role. Their records and observations could offer valuable insights into unexplained phenomena that might be linked to nonhuman technologies. Scientific organizations and astronomical bodies, including NASA, ESA, UNOOSA, and the IAU, are pivotal due to their direct involvement in space research and exploration.

The potential for nonhuman technology’s presence across centuries implies a complex network of knowledge and secrecy, involving these varied institutions. This network would not only span across scientific and aerospace communities but also delve into the realms of historical, cultural, and possibly religious domains.

In contemporary times, the challenge lies in piecing together this intricate puzzle, requiring a cooperative and transparent effort from these diverse entities. The goal is to uncover and understand the full scope of nonhuman technology, pushing for a more open discourse that encompasses all relevant sectors and institutions globally.

The current landscape of nonhuman technology is shrouded in ambiguity, with key international players potentially obfuscating information. This creates a landscape where:

1. Understanding is Limited: Due to limited public disclosure and a lack of transparent research, there’s a significant gap in our understanding of the scope and implications of nonhuman technology.
2. Potential Risks and Benefits: While these technologies could revolutionize fields from medicine to energy, their misuse could pose unprecedented risks to global security and equity.
3. Challenges in Regulation: Establishing a regulatory framework is complicated by the lack of clarity and the potential for these technologies to challenge our current legal and ethical standards.

In addressing these challenges, we must consider the implications of nonhuman technology in shaping a non-materialist ontology of reality, as suggested by the work of the Hipster Energy Team. This approach is not merely academic but forms the foundation for an inclusive understanding of our place in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.

IV. Policy Recommendations for Advancing Towards a Treaty

1. Establishing a Preliminary Agreement Framework: The first crucial step is to develop a preliminary agreement framework among international stakeholders. This framework should outline the need for a treaty and establish basic principles regarding the regulation and ethical use of nonhuman technology. It must emphasize the importance of transparency, cooperation, and shared responsibility among nations and organizations.
2. Convening International Dialogues and Symposia: To facilitate the movement towards a treaty, it is essential to organize international dialogues and symposia involving key stakeholders. These should include representatives from defense and aerospace companies, scientific organizations, cultural and historical institutions, and governments. The goal of these gatherings would be to share knowledge, discuss potential risks and benefits, and build a consensus on the need for and the scope of a treaty.
3. Research and Information Sharing Initiatives: Encourage and support research initiatives that focus on understanding nonhuman technology and its implications. This can be complemented by creating platforms for sharing research findings and information among international entities. These initiatives will help in building a strong knowledge base, which is essential for informed treaty negotiations.

Policy Recommendations

• Drafting a White Paper: Propose the creation of a comprehensive white paper that details the current understanding of nonhuman technology, its potential implications, and the necessity for international regulation. This document should serve as a foundational text to inform treaty discussions.
• Forming an International Working Group: Recommend the formation of an international working group dedicated to the treaty initiative. This group should include experts from various fields and representatives from key institutions to ensure a multi-faceted approach.
• Public Awareness and Engagement Campaigns: Advocate for public awareness campaigns to educate the global community about nonhuman technology. Public understanding and support are crucial for gaining momentum towards a treaty.
• Lobbying Efforts with Governments and International Bodies: Urge concerted lobbying efforts to persuade governments and international bodies like the United Nations to recognize the importance of a treaty on nonhuman technology.

These recommendations are aimed at setting the stage for formal treaty discussions, ensuring that the process is guided by a well-informed, collaborative, and globally inclusive approach.

V. International Collaboration and Governance: Deciding on a Regulatory Framework

1. Debate on Forming a New Regulatory Body vs. Utilizing Existing Structures: A critical discussion point in international governance of nonhuman technology is whether to establish a new regulatory body or integrate these responsibilities into existing organizations. The argument for a new entity rests on the unique nature of nonhuman technology, which may require specialized understanding and oversight. Conversely, utilizing existing bodies like the United Nations or the International Telecommunication Union could offer established frameworks and resources, albeit with the challenge of adapting to the novel aspects of nonhuman technology.
2. Criteria for Effective Governance: Any chosen regulatory framework must be capable of fostering global cooperation, ensuring equitable involvement of all nations. It should be equipped to handle the complex and potentially transformative nature of nonhuman technology. Key considerations include jurisdictional reach, expertise in emerging technologies, and the ability to adapt to rapid advancements.
3. Mechanisms for Transparent Information Exchange: Regardless of the regulatory structure, there must be robust mechanisms for transparent information sharing. This includes not only technological data but also policy developments, research findings, and incident reports. Such transparency is essential for building trust among nations and ensuring that the governance of nonhuman technology is conducted in the interest of global security and progress.

VI. Legal and Ethical Framework for Nonhuman Technology

1. Establishing Dynamic Legal Frameworks: In a landscape where nonhuman technology potentially disrupts our conventional understanding, it becomes imperative to establish legal frameworks that are flexible and adaptable. These frameworks must be capable of evolving with the rapid advancements in nonhuman technology while ensuring that they are inclusive and representative of the broader population’s interests, not just those of elites1 and aerospace companies. This adaptability is vital to ensure that legal structures remain relevant and effective in a rapidly changing technological landscape.
2. Comprehensive Ethical Guidelines: Ethical considerations are at the heart of managing nonhuman technology, especially in scenarios where potential conspiracies involving elites and aerospace companies are uncovered. Ethical guidelines must prioritize transparency, accountability, and the equitable distribution of technology benefits. They should address the unique nature of nonhuman entities, including considerations for potential sentience and the impact of these technologies on human life and the environment. In doing so, the guidelines must be framed to protect the interests of the broader public and prevent monopolization or misuse by powerful entities.
3. Intellectual Property Rights and Equitable Access: The issue of intellectual property rights in the realm of nonhuman technology demands careful consideration. Policies should ensure that these rights do not become tools for elites or corporations to monopolize advancements. Instead, intellectual property regulations must facilitate equitable access and encourage collaborative advancements in the field. This approach is essential to prevent a scenario where the control and benefits of nonhuman technology are concentrated in the hands of a few.
4. Liability in the Face of Unknowns: As nonhuman technology ventures into uncharted territories, traditional concepts of liability may need to be re-evaluated. Liability frameworks should be designed to ensure that those responsible for potential harms or misuses are held accountable, especially in cases where deceptive practices by powerful entities are involved. This will involve a careful balancing act between encouraging innovation and protecting public welfare.
5. A Fair Resolution for All Stakeholders: The legal and ethical framework for nonhuman technology must aim for a resolution that balances the interests of all stakeholders, including the public, governments, scientific communities, and private entities. It should be designed to dismantle any existing structures of deception or concealment, ensuring that the benefits and risks of nonhuman technology are transparently and fairly managed.

This approach to the legal and ethical aspects of nonhuman technology is not just a necessity but a commitment to ensuring a fair and equitable future for all, countering the potential for elite domination and fostering a more inclusive technological advancement.

Thanks for reading Elevated Solidarity! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

VII. Future Perspectives and Research Directions

1. Identifying Future Research Areas: Encourage research that explores the potential and limits of nonhuman technology, focusing on humanitarian, environmental, and societal benefits.
2. Adaptive Policy-Making: Advocate for policies that are flexible and adaptable to the evolving landscape of nonhuman technology, allowing for rapid response to new developments and challenges.
3. Promoting Responsible Technological Development: Emphasize the importance of developing nonhuman technology responsibly, ensuring that it aligns with global ethical standards and contributes positively to human progress.

Conclusion

As we conclude this exploration into the realm of nonhuman technology and its implications for our world, it is essential to recognize the transformative potential of this journey. This policy paper, guided by a rational and careful approach, has laid out the groundwork for understanding and managing these technologies in a way that is inclusive, ethical, and beneficial for all of humanity.

The future of nonhuman technology, intertwined with non-materialist ontologies, presents us with opportunities and challenges that transcend conventional boundaries. It invites us to expand our horizons, rethink our understanding of the universe, and embrace the potential for profound change. Our collective responsibility is to navigate this path with wisdom, foresight, and a commitment to the greater good.

In the spirit of collaboration and progress, this paper urges policymakers, scientists, and global citizens to come together, engage in open dialogue, and work towards a future where the benefits of nonhuman technology are realized responsibly and equitably. Let us move forward with a shared vision, harnessing the best of our rational capabilities, to build a future that honors the complexity of our existence and the potential of our discoveries.

Elevated Solidarity